.
Feedback

LETTER: Changes to Winery Regulations in Santa Clara County

Campbell Patch encourages the Campbell community to share its voice, opinion and thoughts through letters to the editor.

Below is a list of FAQs that should help to clarify what the county is working on for wineries. 

1. Question: Is the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors forcing wineries to discontinue their music series?
Answer: No. Not a single music event has been shut down by the county. A couple of wineries when informed of complaints and who didn’t have permits asked to continue their summer concerts to a specific date, and the county agreed. 


2. Question: Did the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors vote to ban wineries from having events with more than 99 people?
Answer: No. Nothing has been banned. Wineries are required to have permits to insure bathroom, fire, parking, etc. regulations are met for the safety of the public. 

3. Question: Did the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors vote to limit the number of events wineries can have to 12 per year?
Answer: No. 

4. Question: Did the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors vote to limit type of music wineries are allowed to play to “background music?”
Answer: No.

5. Question: Did the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors implement a stricter noise ordinance for wineries only?
Answer: No. The noise ordinance is not being changed at all.

6. Question: Did a petition signed by neighbors of wineries force stricter rules to be enforced? 
Answer: No. No stricter rules are being proposed or enforced. Public petitions are informational for policy makers and staff. They have no bearing on code enforcement.

7. Question: Is the County creating new burdensome and expensive regulations that could cost no less than $80,000?
Answer: No. In fact many permit costs are being reduced. Previous rules required wineries to pay a Use Permit starting at $14,732 that is valid for several years. The new proposals will drop most of those costs to $2,133 and to $0 in several instances.

8. Question: Is the County creating stricter noise ordinances for wineries than for other businesses?
Answer: No. In fact, no changes to the noise ordinance have been proposed as part of this process. Wineries are required to follow the same guidelines as everyone else.

9. Question: Does the County allow public events not at wineries to take place without a Use Permit?
Answer: No. In order to protect the public and meet laws for emergency vehicle access, food safety, bathrooms, etc., permits are required.

10. Question: Are all wineries in the County currently following health, safety and noise laws?
Answer: No. During the process of updating County laws to improve agri-tourism for wineries, it was discovered that some wineries were operating without permits, which is being addressed. 

11. Question: Are the laws that are being proposed more restrictive than existing laws?
Answer: No. They are all less restrictive. 

12. Question: If the new laws are passed by the Board of Supervisors, will music events continue at my favorite winery?
Answer: That depends on if your favorite winery decides to continue them or not. Just like your favorite restaurant, businesses in California are required to meet basic health and safety regulations to insure that the food you eat and the building you are in are safe and sanitary. 

13. Question: Why are these changes being proposed now?
Answer: In 2011, many local wineries asked Santa Clara County to relax the existing rules governing them in order to help make their business easier. 14 changes were recommended by a group of winery owners and other interested parties (the Winery Working Group) over the course of a year during 14 public meetings. 12 of the changes were agreed upon as doable and 2 are currently being discussed (small events and amplified music). All of the revised rules are improvements to existing laws and make it easier and less expensive for winery businesses.

14. Question: Where can I get more information and read the facts for myself?
Answer: All proposed changes are open to the public and can be viewed online at: 
http://www.sccgov.org/sites/planning/Planning%20Studies/Wineries%20and%20Agri-Tourism/Pages/Review-of-Wineries-Provisions.aspxSee More

http://www.sccgov.org/sites/d1/Pages/Supervisor-Mike-Wasserman.aspx

-Santa Clara County District 1 Supervisor Mike Wasserman

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Campbell Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stephen Allen May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
We watched the show last night. Good job ! We always knew you would win if you went on the show.Read More We're glad you did ! All the best - The Allens
Mayra Flores de Marcotte (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 11:19 pm
Congratulations, ladies!
Kirby Wood April 30, 2013 at 01:40 pm
I am impressed with CalTrans ability to do the cleanup, but the problem of homelessness does not goRead More away. Until we find a way to help these people in need, the camps will just move to another location, and everything will start all over again. The homeless need help - whether they want it or not. It's time to get that ball rolling.
Karen Hunt May 1, 2013 at 07:33 pm
Who is Tony Faber? Here is some history from a family member. My name is Karen Hunt and myRead More grandfather is and was Albert Jacob Faber. He owned and ran that bike shop up until his death in 1975. Subsequent to grandpa's death the house/building became the property of my grandmother, Lucille Faber. Upon her death, the property went to my mother, Jackie Faber-Cornick. In 1978, the business, not the building was sold to Alex Lariviere and he has conducted business since. The building was never sold and belongs to my mom, Jackie Cornick. It was her great-grandparents home back in the 1920's. We are shocked and saddened by this tremendous loss. At this time, we are trying to decide the fate of that beloved building. We are currently awaiting forensics tests, engineering and structural reports, and working with the City to keep it safe and prevent it from being vandalized and becoming a blight. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have about the history of Faber's Cyclery. My grandfather was a man of character and integrity. Sadly, neither of his two sons became involved in the business. With that said, anybody claiming to be a Faber or son of Albert Jacob, is just misrepresenting the truth. Thank you for sharing your story and memories! Very truly yours, Karen Hunt Great grandaughter of the owner of the Original Fabers Cyclery.
Connie Carey-Kincaid April 3, 2013 at 01:27 pm
Happy Birthday Evelyn! Your 1st 100yr comment has been our family motto as well! Made me belly laughRead More to hear you feel the same!! Here's to the next 100 yrs and deal the cards!
Karen Richardson April 2, 2013 at 05:03 pm
Happy birthday, Evelyn - and love your comment about turning 100. You're an inspiration!
Mayra Flores de Marcotte (Editor) April 2, 2013 at 04:05 pm
Happy, happy birthday Evelyn!
Jessica April 23, 2013 at 05:26 pm
We have sold 108 tickets which means this screening is happening FOR SURE!! Now there are only 42Read More seats left, so if you at all thought you might want to go, you want to purchase your seats ASAP at http://gathr.us/screening/2828